Keywords:
polymorphs, polymorphism, solvates, hydrates, crystal habits, digestion,
flowability, powder mixing, dissolution, solubility, bioavailability, API
The
specification of a particular three dimensional connectivity table for a
chemical substance does not produce a single physical form of the
substance. A uniquely covalently bonded
molecular array very often orders itself in multiple ways in the solid state.
This is often, but not always, related to different conformations (rotational
isomers) that can be the major conformer when the covalent substance is packed
into the crystal lattice. Two such
different physical forms are called polymorphs if the two have the same
elemental analysis but different powder x-ray diffraction patterns.
Synthetic chemists
from predominantly academic backgrounds, when they begin to prepare organic
substances in 100s of grams or more, often see but do not recognize the
significance of different qualities of the same solid. Most often these differences come from
different polymorphs that may have also crystallized in different crystal
habits. Although these differences are
not significant in synthetic terms, for the success of a project they are tremendously
important with respect to formulation difficulties, if the product is a
pharmaceutical final product.
Kilomentor
vividly remembers the first project he took into the plant. The first intermediate, when produced on
scale, either precipitated as a finely divided mud that took many hours to
filter or less often as a material with the consistency of course sand that
seemed to filter in minutes. Although it
was of minor importance in the laboratory, the plant operators had a strong
preference.
If two
substances have the same three dimensional covalently bonded array, have the
same powder x-ray diffraction pattern and the same elemental analysis, but look
different, then the two substances are at the unit cell scale the same but have
what is called different crystal habits.
Crystal
habits are distinguished by the average relative dimensions of the macroscopic
crystal forms. For example, a substance
may crystallize as needles, plates, or rhombs.
A crystal habit difference occurs when two or more faces of the crystal
grow at different relative rates.
It is an
elementary teaching from inorganic gravimetric analysis that if a solid is too
fine to allow rapid quantitative filtering in high purity, this condition can
often be improved by what is called digestion.
For example,
in a Textbook of Quantitative Inorganic Analysis including Instrumental
Analysis, Arthur I. Vogel, Third Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York. N.Y.
1961, at page 111-112 it is taught:
“This [digestion] is usually carried out by allowing the precipitate to
stand for 12-24 hours at room temperature, or sometimes by warming the
precipitate for some time, in contact with the liquid from which it was formed:
the object is, of course, to obtain complete precipitation in a form which can
easily be filtered. During the process of digestion or the ageing of
precipitates, at least two changes occur. The very small particles, which have
a greater solubility than the larger ones, will, after precipitation has
occurred, tend to pass into solution, and will ultimately redeposit on the
larger particles; co-precipitation on the minute particles is thus eliminated
and the total co-precipitation on the ultimate precipitate reduced. The rapidly formed crystals are probably of
irregular shape and possess a comparatively large surface; upon digestion these
tend to become more regular in character and also more dense, thus leading to a
decrease in the area of surface and a consequent reduction of adsorbtion. The net result of digestion is usually to
reduce the extent of co-precipitation and to increase the size of the
particles, rendering filtration easier”.
It is well
known that pronounced variations in the crystallization conditions:
temperature, rate of temperature change, intensity of stirring, the initial
level of supersaturation, solvent type and polarity, water content, type and
concentration of impurities (particularly structurally related impurities)
concentration and the solution viscosity affect crystal habit. Further
complicating the operation, many of these factors change as the crystallization
proceeds. Crystal habits probably will not affect
solubility, dissolution rate or bioavailability. Crystal habits can be important for the flow
properties of powder mixtures, but as skilled practitioners know, problems in this
area can be addressed by granulation of the active or by grinding, micronizing
or other well known mechanical aggregation or disintegration methods.
The core
factors that affect crystal habit also affect the crystal size because they
cause different variations in the rates of crystal nucleation and crystal
growth. Synthetic chemists typically are
most experienced in the wide variety of conditions that may promote crystal
nucleation because without crystal nucleation a product is most likely to give
an undesirable oil. The optimal crystal
nucleation temperature is rarely the best temperature to increase the rate of
crystal growth. That is why on laboratory scale, crystallization is often
promoted by alternate raising and lowering the temperature, having different
parts of the oil at different temperatures, or by stirring and scratching with
a glass rod to create discontinuities on the vessel’s walls, where nucleation
can begin.
Two or more
chemical substances can also crystallize together in an organized relationship
within the crystal lattice. This is much
more common than is realized because all racemic compounds are co-crystals of
the two enantiomeric forms. Co-crystals
when one of the chemical species is a relatively volatile substance are called solvates
of the non solvent moiety. Co-crystals
in which the solvent in the solvate is water are called hydrates of the
non-volatile constituent.
It was once
thought that the melting point of a solid is an invariant characteristic of a
particular covalent atomic arrangement (molecular structure) but the existence
of polymorphic forms shows that this is not true. Different polymorphic can have different
melting points. Very often however when
a melting point is being determined by visual observation, two polymorphs will
appear to have the same melting point when they actually do not because the
lower melting form may be converting, unobserved, to the higher melting form
during the melting point determination or the two polymorphs may have different
melting points which are very close to each other.
A synthetic
process chemist who prepares a three dimensional covalent structure different
from the target structure has failed in the project. The synthetic organic process chemist has
succeeded however no matter what polymorph, solvate or hydrate is recovered
from the final synthetic step. This is because polymorphs are regularly and
simply interconverted and solvates and hydrates are typically readily
desolvated, usually by some combination of vacuum, heat and chemical reaction
of the solvating substance. The use of dehydrating agents is a common example
of this.
Although
polymorphs, solvates and hydrates are rather unimportant to the synthetic
chemist, they are very important to formulators who work to make pharmaceutical
dosage forms like tablets, powders or capsules and to patent chemists who try
to create intellectual property that provides a legal monopoly for
pharmaceutical companies. Although
polymorphs can be found by applying routine screening strategies, patenting
these new polymorphs of medicinally importance compounds can extend the legal
monopolies of the ‘inventors’ by a dozen years or more. The anti-cholesterol drug, atorvastatin,
first discovered by Pfizer, was the most prescribed medicine in the world and
there are 23 known polymorphic forms,
most or all of which have been patented.
Although the
greatest importance of polymorphs is that they can be used to extend
pharmaceutical patent monopolies, the differences between polymorphs, hydrates
and other pharmaceutically acceptable solvates can be important when these
forms are incorporated with excipients into a drug product such as a tablet or
capsule. One crystalline polymorph might
formulate to produce a stable suspension while another might deteriorate on
storage. One polymorph has been known to
have up to ten times the absolute solubility of another and this can affect the
bioavailability. Different polymorphs have different tendencies to retain solvent
and this can be important for the removal of impurities during the washing of a
crystalline API. Different polymorphs of
a particular pharmaceutical can have different tendencies to be created in
different crystal habits and crystal habit and crystal size are key
determinants of the flow properties and manufacturability of API in solid
powder mixtures.
No comments:
Post a Comment